Effective July 1, 2015, Philadelphia Water updated its Stormwater Regulations for development to meet requirements of the Clean Water Act. The changes claim to improve the health of Philadelphia's rivers, minimize local flooding, and encourage the use of green infrastructure throughout the city. The revised Stormwater Management Guidance Manual, Version 3.0 contains policies and procedures that reflect the new Stormwater Regulation requirements and offers enhanced resources to the development community with respect to stormwater management. A summary of changes can be found at the Philadelphia Watershed's website:
It took a federal court to ask for guidance, but the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has finally formally declared as law a concept most construction lawyers already assumed to be the case: the Pennsylvania Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act does not apply to public works projects.
The Supreme Court offered this opinion when asked by the federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals for guidance on the issue in the matter of Clipper Pipe & Service, Inc. v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. The question arose after the District Court awarded CASPA damages against Ohio Casualty on work performed by Clipper Pipe under its agreement to help construct the Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Training Center in the Lehigh Valley. Citing conflicting case law, the District Court denied the defendants' summary judgment motion and permitted an award of CASPA damages after Clipper was successful at trial.
The analysis focused on the rules of statutory construction and, more specifically, the definition of an owner. The Court agreed with Ohio Casualty that use of the word "association" in the statutory definition was insufficient to include a governmental entity. The owner of the project in this case - the Department of Navy - was too dissimilar to a corporate or business entity owner to make the analogy work either. This logic, in combination with another standard rule of statutory construction requiring laws which infringe on the sovereignty of a public body to be narrowly construed, necessitated a conclusion that CASPA does not apply to public projects.
Joseph Dougherty, 73, former head of Philadelphia's largest ironworkers union, was sentenced Monday to 19 years and two months in federal prison after being convicted of overseeing a campaign of sabotage and intimidation of nonunion contractors including the 2012 torching of a Quaker Meetinghouse in Chestnut Hill. In addition, Dougherty will have to pay over $500,000 in restitution.
Dougherty is the last defendant of 12 to be sentenced in this case.
Among the most famous buildings in the world, the White House is the residence and working space for the President of the United States. Despite its unique name, it was not always white and not always known as the White House. Do you know how the White House came to be known by that name?
If you know the answer, post it in the comments section below. We will reveal the answer this weekend.
In one of the most impactful decisions of the last decade for both the insurance and construction industries, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co., that defective work was not an occurrence under a commercial general liability insurance policy when the underlying claims "triggering" coverage sound in contract. Courts in other jurisdictions, however, have been methodically swinging in the other direction. It may ultimately spell the end of the narrow reading the Kvaerner decision imposes on CGL policies in Pennsylvania.
The most recent example of the erosion of Kvaerner's narrow definition of the term "occurrence" came in a case captioned Pennsylvania Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. St. Catherine of Siena Parish. The federal Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that "unexpected and unintended property damage" is an occurrence. Significantly, the Court agreed that the standard contractual liability exclusion in CGL policies does not provide an avenue to disclaim coverage.
The case arose when St. Catherine of Siena Parish hired a contractor to replace the roof on two of its buildings. One began leaking almost immediately after installation and the other showed signs of leaking within 18 months. The leaks infiltrated the building and began causing damage to walls and ceilings which were, importantly, not part of the contractor's scope of work. Because the work was technically performed by a subcontractor, the "your work" exclusion could not be relied upon to deny coverage. Instead, the insurance company maintained that the failure to install the roof properly was a breach of contract claim and therefore excluded from coverage under the contractual liability exclusion clause of the policy.
A large project to build retail and commercial space on a 52 acre plot in Bethlehem has been slowed. At issue are two items.
First, the redevelopment would likely require the demolition of the Martin Tower. The current zoning laws in the area prohibit demolition of the building; but the planning commission is considering a change to City ordinances in order to permit the building to be torn down. In so doing, they are taking the opportunity to impose some of their vision for the project on the developer by voting to table the zoning change pending guidance from the developer as to how it proposes to include more residential components to the project.
The second component causing some contention - albeit seemingly less - is that the Martin Tower is a historically significant building in Bethlehem. Built approximately 40 years ago, it was the headquarters for Bethlehem Steel before operations shut down. It is also the tallest building in the Lehigh Valley and on the National Register of Historic Places. Some, as a result, see the building as worth preserving.
The Pennsylvania Convention Center Authority recently filed a federal civil lawsuit against Metropolitan Regional Council of Carpenters, one of the two unions barred from working at the property, after failing to sign a new, more exhibitor-friendly customer satisfaction agreement. The lawsuit also names individual members of the Carpenters' union.
The Convention Center's lawsuit seeks to recover more than $1 million in damages suffered by the authority by the Carpenters union through its activity over the past year, which Convention Center management said included "illegal and disruptive mass picketing and protests; physical intimidation, harassment, stalking, and assault and battery; verbal intimidation, harassment, race-baiting, and threats; and the destruction of property."
Hunterdon County Superior Court Judge Paul Armstrong has invalidated Readington Township's taking of the property that is Solberg-Hunterdon Airport and ordered the Township to pay attorney and expert fees, citing "manifest abuse of the power of eminent domain."
In a 54 page opinion, the Court admonishes the Township stating "[i]ndeed, the evidence clearly and convincingly shows that these reasons were a pre-text for Readington Township's true purpose, which was to limit the airport's capacity to remain economically competitive and to limit its expansion." The decision notes a series of events occurring just after Solberg released a master plan to expand and improve upon its airport in 1997, including the Township's hiring of a public relations firm to handle the expansion which the PR firm identified as the Township's "main issue" and a "problem".
Subsequently, in 2006, the Township enacted an ordinance authorizing the taking of 724 acres of land owned by Solberg Aviation Co., which fueled a long legal battle captioned Readington Township v. Solberg Aviation, involving several appeals and has continued through to this most recent decision. This most recent opinion comes after the Appellate Division remanded the matter to the trial court in 2009 directing that the trial court determine whether the taking was proper under the New Jersey Eminent Domain Act. Armstrong's opinion, however, highlights that the critical issue is not whether a municipality has the right to condemn land for non-use purposes, but whether a township may "engage in concerted subterfuge to reach [an] objective".
The Township's attorney informs that he and his client are "disappointed in the outcome" and are reviewing options.
As part of the reaction to the tragic loss of life when a demolition contractor caused a building collapse at 22nd and Market Streets approximately 2 years ago, Philadelphia City Council passed a new city ordinance imposing licensure requirements for demolition contractors. That law, which was signed by Mayor Nutter, also imposed a new training requirement for some contractors to obtain and keep their contractor's license.
The City of Philadelphia is reminding contractor's that changes to the code requiring OSHA certifications to carry a license will go into effect on September 30, 2015. More specifically, contractors that are required to carry a license to work in the City of Philadelphia must show completion of an extended course of training "certified by the Department to provide significant public safety benefit, appropriate to the position, which course may include OSHA 30 training". The only carve out in the ordinance for this particular requirement is for plumbers, fire suppression and fire suppression contractors, and electricians when any of those trades are not serving as general contractors. The exception exists because of pre-existing training requirements in those fields.
The language in the law is not entirely clear. It suggests that courses which are the equivalent of an OSHA approved class can be approved, but no information is provided as to what other programs are available. Questions surrounding who decides what is equivalent also remain. These questions, however, will not delay implementation of the law. As a result, contractors should be aware and seek out OSHA certified training that provides the applicable OSHA 10 Hour or OSHA 30 Hour Certifications. These are the only programs that are known to be compliant.
In Pennsylvania, the law currently provides an exception in the criminal code that prohibits the prosecution of the crimes of harassment, stalking, and threatening to use a weapon of mass destruction if those otherwise criminal acts are done as part of a labor dispute. Beginning last year, an effort was undertaken in the state legislature to close that loophole.
Former House Bill 1154 was the subject of much maneuvering between the State Senate and the State House as Governor Corbett prepared to leave office last year. Due to differences between leaders in the two chambers, two separate versions were passed and never reconciled in conference committee. As a result, the session expired without a final version being passed and sent to the Governor for signature.